No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority [Lysander Spooner] on Amazon. com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. But whether the Constitution really be . 10 Jan Treason by Lysander Spooner · No. 1.→ Spooner issued three pamphlets carrying the title of No Treason, numbered 1, II, and VI. Spooner. No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. December 9, Lysander Spooner. The greatest case for anarchist political philosophy ever written. Narrated by.
|Published (Last):||17 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||17.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
According to Spooner, the slave’s rights were to be the same as everyone else’s due to their birth qualifications. And if he makes war upon it, he does so as an open enemy, and not as a traitor that is, as a betrayer, or treacherous friend”.
They are usually, if not always, established by the less numerous party; their superior strength consisting in their superior wealth, intelligence, and ability to act in concert. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Taxes, Lysander states, cannot be claimed as proof of consent, because they are compulsory, therefore not consensual. That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals.
No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority
He knows it only traeson its pretended agents. No Treason is a composition of three essays, all written in Additionally, Spooner questions how majority influence may have had more impact on the creation of the nation, instead of everyone, questioning once more the idea of consent and what makes a nation under consent.
Spooner, a lawyer, starts “No Authority” by examining its potential validity as a binding contract, pointing out that the US Constitution could have no inherent, lasting authority, lysandeg as a contract between men, and that it only claims to be one between the people existing when it was written.
Spooner acknowledges the fact that total consent is not possible in a democratic government and mentions the separation of majorities and minorities.
What happens to the people who do not believe in the ideals that established the United States? The problem with equating consent with any type of participation for the state, Spooner argues, cannot be spoober achieved, because not everyone necessarily agrees with the ways of showing consent or even with the ideas provided by the government. According to the law, it means treason, treaso Spooner explains: And their representatives at Philadelphia, who first declared Independence, were, in the eye of the constitutional law of that day, simply a committee of Revolutionists, and in no sense constitutional authorities, or the representatives of constitutional authorities.
If it be said that the consent of the most numerous party, in a nation, is sufficient to justify the establishment of their power over the less numerous party, it may be answered: The corporation can exist past the lifespan of its original owners, but only by people taking ownership of it voluntarily over time, not by some kind of forced ownership by descendents.
No Treason, Vol. VI.: The Constitution of No Authority by Lysander Spooner
In proportion to her wealth and population, the North has probably expended more money and blood to maintain lysandrr power over an unwilling people, than any other government ever did.
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. That men may rightfully be compelled to submit ho, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals.
Spooner mentions how consent resides within each person, and treasln numbers should not dictate who starts entities such as political groups. This idea was the dominant lysanver on which the war was carried on; and it is the dominant one, now that we have got what is called “peace.
The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: Moreover, it was only as separate individuals, each acting for himself, and not as members of organized governments, that the three millions declared their consent to lysannder necessary to their support of ltsander government; and, at the same time, declared their dissent to the support of the British Crown.
Spooner was an outspoken abolitionist writing The Unconstitutionality of Slavery in and advocate of universal freedom and natural rights, but had been horrified by the brutality of the war, and the lack of legitimate constitution basis for violently conquering people who wanted to leave a federation that had been consensually joined only by their ancestors. The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: If it be the spoone of the Constitution, the Constitution itself should be at once overthrown.
A lawyer by training, a strong abolitionistradical thinker, and anarchistSpooner wrote these specific pamphlets in order to express his discontent with the state and its legitimizing documents in the United States, the U. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The answer to this question must certainly be, that at least such a nation exists by no right whatever. The governments, then existing in the Colonies, had no constitutional power, as governments, to declare the separation between England and America.
No Treason, Vol. VI.: The Constitution of No Authority by Lysander Spooner – Free Ebook
I am the State: The monarchs and governments, from whom they choose to separate, attempt to stigmatize them as traitors. His main argument fell under the idea that slavery was not mentioned in the Constitution:.
It is not improbable that many or most of the worst of governments—although established by force, and by a few, in the lysanedr place—come, in time, to be supported by a majority.
Previous to the war, there were some grounds for saying that—in theory, at least, if not in practice—our government was a free one; that it rested on consent. Still, Spooner does not believe it treason should be alleged when one is open about their opinion. I have evidence satisfactory to myself, that there exists, scattered throughout the country, a band of men, having a tacit understanding with each other, and calling themselves “the people of the United States,” whose general purposes are to control and plunder each other, and all other persons in the country, and, so far as they can, even in neighboring countries; and to kill every man who shall attempt to defend his person and property against their schemes of plunder and dominion.
Works — Lysander Spooner
And all governments—though the best on earth in other respects—are nevertheless tyrannies to that portion of the people—whether few or many—who are compelled to support them against their will. If it be said that the consent of the most numerous party, in a nation, is sufficient to justify the establishment of their power over the less numerous party, it may be answered:. It is the one on which the Constitution itself professes to rest. The Constitution of No Authority.